Re: autovacuum: recommended?
| От | hubert depesz lubaczewski |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: autovacuum: recommended? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20071116094541.GA5177@depesz.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | autovacuum: recommended? (Gábor Farkas <gabor@nekomancer.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: autovacuum: recommended?
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:40:43AM +0100, Gábor Farkas wrote: > we are moving one database from postgresql-7.4 to postgresql-8.2.4. any particular reason why not 8.2.5? > > my question is: is it recommended to use it? or in other words, should i > only use autovacuum? or it's better to use manual-vacuuming? which one > is the "way of the future" :) ? or should i use both auto-vacuum and > manual-vacuum? autovacuum is definitely prefered (for most of the cases). you might want to set vacuum delays though. depesz -- quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :) http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: