Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200711141857.18832.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm
Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm Re: Spinlock backoff algorithm |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, > I've got one upstairs (HPPA), and I believe that it's actually a pretty > common situation in scientifically-oriented workstations from a few > years back. Last I checked, scientific workstations aren't exactly a common platform for PostgreSQL servers. The question is, for our most common platforms (like AMD and Intel) is the FPU notably slower/more contended than integer division? I'd the impression that it was, but my knowledge of chip architectures is liable to be out of date. Can we have a hardware geek speak up? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: