On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:26:52AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> That's a fairly ugly/messy way of doing it. If you're going to need a C
> function anyway, why not just do it directly? As in the attachment.
actually you dont have to do it in c.
alec pointed (in comments) that there already is statement_timestamp()
function, so you can remove the c code, and use statement_timestamp()
instead of get_statement_timestamp().
depesz
--
quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a
highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :)
http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)