Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Дата
Msg-id 200711110514.lAB5ExN19424@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-docs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the
> >> conversion?
>
> > I see dblink:
> >     http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html
>
> Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ files are
> still there.

Because I thought only READMEs were converted.  Removed now.

> > I assume spi wasn't done because it is just examples of SPI usage.
>
> The .example files are fine, but what about the two README files?

My guess is they were not converted because they are READMEs that
related to the examples.  We can convert them if people want.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Следующее
От: Albert Cervera i Areny
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation