Re: Hardware for PostgreSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Treat
Тема Re: Hardware for PostgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id 200711081214.35899.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Hardware for PostgreSQL  (Ketema <ketema@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 12:45, Ketema wrote:
> I am trying to build a very Robust DB server that will support 1000+
> concurrent users (all ready have seen max of 237 no pooling being
> used).  I have read so many articles now that I am just saturated.  I
> have a general idea but would like feedback from others.
>

Most of the other answers you've gotten have been pretty good, but I had some
questions on the above; specifically is there a reason you're avoid pooling?
(something like pgbouncer can work wonders).  Are your 1000+ concurrent users
working in something like a web environment, where they won't need a 1:1
user:connection map to service them all, or are these going to be more
permanent connections into the system?  FWIW I'd done 1000 connections
simultaneous on pretty basic hardware, but you need to have the right kind of
workloads to be able to do it.

>
> Who has built the biggest baddest Pg server out there and what do you
> use?
>

While I'm not sure this will be that much help, I'd feel remisce if I didn't
point you to it...
http://www.lethargy.org/~jesus/archives/66-Big-Bad-PostgreSQL.html

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a /
Следующее
От: "Carlo Stonebanks"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin