Re: prepared statements suboptimal?
От
Reg Me Please
Тема
Re: prepared statements suboptimal?
Дата
Msg-id
200711071238.28088.regmeplease@gmail.com
Ответ на
prepared statements suboptimal? (rihad)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
prepared statements suboptimal? rihad <rihad@mail.ru>
Re: prepared statements suboptimal? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: prepared statements suboptimal? rihad <rihad@mail.ru>
Re: prepared statements suboptimal? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: prepared statements suboptimal? Reg Me Please <regmeplease@gmail.com>
Re: prepared statements suboptimal? rihad <rihad@mail.ru>
Re: prepared statements suboptimal? "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
Il Wednesday 07 November 2007 12:25:46 rihad ha scritto: > I don't understand why postgres couldn't plan this: > SELECT foo.e, foo.f > FROM foo > WHERE pk=$1 AND b=$2 AND status='1' AND c <= $3; > > to be later executed any slower than > > SELECT foo.e, foo.f > FROM foo > WHERE pk='abcabc' AND b='13' AND status='1' AND c <= '2007-11-20 13:14:15'; One solution is that the planner will work when it will see the query. At that time the comparisons are all against unknown values. Try the same with dyamical SQL, that is you dynamically build by placing the current values instead of the $1, $2 and $3 placeholders. In this case the planner will see the query with all current real values. Then you execute it and compare the timings. Maybe you get better scores: there's no warranty for better performances becasue you are going to send the whole query again and again to the planner. Of course you need a plpgsql function for this. -- Reg me Please
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления