Re: more problems with count(*) on large table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
Дата
Msg-id 20070928165034.GG18001@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: more problems with count(*) on large table  ("A. Kretschmer" <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>)
Ответы Re: more problems with count(*) on large table  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Re: more problems with count(*) on large table  ("A. Kretschmer" <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>)
Re: more problems with count(*) on large table  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-general
A. Kretschmer wrote:
> am  Fri, dem 28.09.2007, um 11:56:46 -0400 mailte Mike Charnoky folgendes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am still having problems performing a count(*) on a large table.  This
> >
> > Now, certain count(*) queries are failing to complete for certain time
> > ranges (I killed the query after about 24 hours).  The table is indexed
> > on a timestamp field.  Here is one query that hangs:
>
> Again: an index can't help! Because of MVCC: 'select count(*)' without
> WHERE-condition forces an seq. table-scan.

But he does have a WHERE condition.  THe problem is, probably, that the
condition is not selective enough so the planner chooses to do a
seqscan.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "A. Kretschmer"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
Следующее
От: Nico Sabbi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: row->ARRAY or row->table casting?