Re: Change request ...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martijn van Oosterhout
Тема Re: Change request ...
Дата
Msg-id 20070927094436.GA13133@svana.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Change request ...  ("Anoo Sivadasan Pillai" <aspillai@in.rm.com>)
Ответы Re: Change request ...  (Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith@pooteeweet.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:48:52PM +0530, Anoo Sivadasan Pillai wrote:
> Description :   I have two tables with the same data , While I issue an
> update command to increment the value of a unique field by 1, the
> statement fails in one table and will succeed in the other table.
> Following is the script to reproduce the behaviour.

Correct. Unique constraints are not deferrable. I'm sure there are
people who would like it fixed, but there is currently not even a
proposal on how to do it. It's a hard problem, for which there are
well-known work-arounds. In practice this problem don't come up too
often.

It's been on the TODO list for at least 5 years...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Richard Huxton
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Change request ...
Следующее
От: Lukas Kahwe Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Change request ...