Re: random_page_costs - are defaults of 4.0 realistic for SCSI RAID 1

Luke,

>  We (GP) have implemented
> something we call "Adaptive Nested Loop" to replace a nested loop +
> index scan with a hash join when the selectivity estimates are off in
> order to improve this behavior.  We also run with a
> "random_page_cost=100" because we generally run on machines with fast
> sequential I/O.

So, when is this getting contributed?  ;-)

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco