Re: invalidly encoded strings

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martijn van Oosterhout
Тема Re: invalidly encoded strings
Дата
Msg-id 20070909105945.GA11896@svana.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на invalidly encoded strings  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: invalidly encoded strings  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 12:02:28AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> . what do we need to do to make the verification code more efficient? I
> think we need to address the correctness issue first, but doing so
> should certainly make us want to improve the verification code. For
> example, I'm wondering if it might benefit from having a tiny cache.

It has been pointed out the the verification for UTF-8 is very
inefficient, involving several function calls to first get the length,
then check characters, etc. It could be significantly improved. I don't
know whether a cache would make any useful difference.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Heikki Linnakangas"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ispell dictionary broken in CVS HEAD ?
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: invalidly encoded strings