Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200708301922520000@92467553 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal
l 2007)
Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> ------- Original Message ------- > From: "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie@gmail.com> > To: "Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net>,"PostgreSQL Advocacy List" <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org> > Sent: 30/08/07, 19:02:35 > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007) > > On 8/30/07, Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> wrote: > > > I am. What I object to is declaring this as a postgresql.org conference when it hasn't been generally agreed in an appropriatecommunity forum (which would be -advocacy imho). Doing so effectively allows *anyone* to organise an event andcall it 'official' - which I believe is definitely not something we want for a whole heap of reasons. > > > > I would like for this to be an 'official' event. > > How do we go about getting 'official' approval? There is no formal process (yet), but I would suggest that general agreement (or lack of disagreement) of this forum (-advocacy)that the organisers are well enough known to be trusted and the proposed event is appropriate. Personally I have no doubts on either point in this instance, given that you and JD are involved. Anyone disagree? Regards, Dave
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: