Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> I'm having trouble following what's going on with autovacuum and I'm finding
> the existing logging insufficient. In particular that it's only logging vacuum
> runs *after* the vacuum finishes makes it hard to see what vacuums are running
> at any given time. Also, I want to see what is making autovacuum decide to
> forgo vacuuming a table and the log with that information is at DEBUG2.
So did this idea go anywhere?
--
Alvaro Herrera Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
Officer Krupke, what are we to do?
Gee, officer Krupke, Krup you! (West Side Story, "Gee, Officer Krupke")