pgsql: Apparently icc doesn't always define __ICC, and it's more correct

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От tgl@postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Тема pgsql: Apparently icc doesn't always define __ICC, and it's more correct
Дата
Msg-id 20070805151140.6EEE19FB8FF@postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-committers
Дерево обсуждения 
Log Message:
-----------
Apparently icc doesn't always define __ICC, and it's more correct to
check for __INTEL_COMPILER.  Per report from Dirk Tilger.
Not back-patched since I don't fully trust it yet ...

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/include/storage:
        s_lock.h (r1.162 -> r1.163)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/storage/s_lock.h.diff?r1=1.162&r2=1.163)

В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: tgl@postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Дата:
Сообщение: pgsql: Fix up bad layout of some comments (probably pg_indent's fault),
Следующее
От: tgl@postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Дата:
Сообщение: pgsql: Adjust configure so that it sets CFLAGS properly for Intel's icc