Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200708050908480000@736122464 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> ------- Original Message ------- > From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> > To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> > Sent: 05/08/07, 00:54:16 > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki > > And you think, that I don't recognize the *exact* level of what needs to > be confidential or that by chance I would not communicate in discrete > and finite detail of what a potential or existing sponsor would wish to > be known? Well I would have thought so, but as you seem to be using it as an argument for managing and publishing information on awiki I'm really not sure. > We do indeed need sponsor management, I can either do it the hard way, > which is to draw up a new page every time or I can do it the easy way in > which to have a dynamic interface that is easy to manage. > > The hard way, is exactly why we have neglected our partners (sponsors) > to date, because of time, and resources. It is also the exact same > reason that Berkus has *also* not provided a new sponsors page. So when was the last time you asked for an update? And even if it did become a chore, we would move it into the database (trivial for us), not use a wiki. That way we couldkeep the confidential info confined to the admin interface. /D
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: