Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200708042208370000@1363317109 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
|
Список | pgsql-www |
> ------- Original Message ------- > From: Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> > To: "Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org> > Sent: 04/08/07, 21:19:54 > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki > > Geez Dave, you seem awefully bitter about this Not at all. > (And given I've cleaned up > plenty of spam/junk in our website, sometimes 100+ at a time, and it > generally involves nothing more than a few sql commands, I'm not sure why) If it's from the same batch, then yes, you can often do this. > But in any case, none of that stuff propogated out to the main website, which > was the whole point of this; keeping vandalism/mischief out of public view. See Magnus' comment... Not that I think that's the point. > I > think were capable of accomplishing that (though I guess you think it we're > much closer to the edge...) All too often new volunteers fail to keep interest. Virtually all website moderation is done by the same 4 or so people,all of whom are very longterm contributors and have been doing it for years. I for one don't mind doing the moderation work, but I 'm wary of new ideas which may eventually become part of that workif the initial folks lose interest. I don't think that's unreasonable. /D
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: