Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Fetter
Тема Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia
Дата
Msg-id 20070803154948.GR17022@fetter.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia  (mljv@planwerk6.de)
Ответы Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia
Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia
Список pgsql-general
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:25:41AM +0200, mljv@planwerk6.de wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 2. August 2007 22:37 schrieben Sie:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:58:40AM +0200, mljv@planwerk6.de wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i would like to use a statement replication for postgresql
> >
> > Why?
>
> i have read
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/high-availability.html
>
> i want 4 synchronous databases with load balancing, so my
> application has high performance and high availability.

Very few people actually need synchronous replication, and those who
do buy Oracle's RAC (and curse it) or use DB2's offering (and also
curse it ;).  For most purposes, fast asynchronous replication is good
enough.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666
                              Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: index bloat WAS: reindexing pg_shdepend
Следующее
От: "Sibte Abbas"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: parsed queries (cursors) cashing issues