User concurrency thresholding: where do I look?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема User concurrency thresholding: where do I look?
Дата
Msg-id 200707190828.59088.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look?  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Folks,

I've run into this a number of times with various PostgreSQL users, so we
tested it at Sun.  What seems to be happening is that at some specific number
of connections average throughput drops 30% and response time quadruples or
worse.  The amount seems to vary per machine; I've seen it as variously 95,
1050, 1700 or 2800 connections.  Tinkering with postgresql.conf parameters
doesn't seem to affect this threshold.

As an example of this behavior:

Users    Txn/User  Resp. Time
50    105.38    0.01
100    113.05    0.01
150    114.05    0.01
200    113.51    0.01
250    113.38    0.01
300    112.14    0.01
350    112.26    0.01
400    111.43    0.01
450    110.72    0.01
500    110.44    0.01
550    109.36    0.01
600    107.01    0.02
650    105.71    0.02
700    106.95    0.02
750    107.69    0.02
800    106.78    0.02
850    108.59    0.02
900    106.03    0.02
950    106.13    0.02
1000    64.58    0.15
1050    52.32    0.23
1100    49.79    0.25

Tinkering with shared_buffers has had no effect on this threholding (the above
was with 3gb to 6gb of shared_buffers).   Any ideas on where we should look
for the source of the bottleneck?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Luke Lonergan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Parrallel query execution for UNION ALL Queries
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: User concurrency thresholding: where do I look?