Re: Regarding Distributed Database features
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Regarding Distributed Database features |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200707131239.57807.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Regarding Distributed Database features ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Friday 13 July 2007 11:16, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Chidambaram Janamaddi wrote:
> > Hello!
> > Can you please let me know whether postgreSQL has
> > Distributed Database supporting features?
>
> No.
>
While the question is far too vague to be given a solid answer, I think you're
being dismissive of question. PostgreSQL works fine as a piece of a
distributed database solution, though it generally requires some glue code to
make it all work, but that's generally true of most databasee.
> > Which of the Distributed database functionalities are totally or
> > partially supported among the following ......................
> >
> > * Local autonomy
> > * No reliance on a central site
> > * Continuous operation
> > * Location independence
> > * Fragmentation independence
> > * Replication independence
> > * Distributed query independence
> > * Distributed transaction processing
> > * Hardware independence
> > * Operating system independence
> > * Network independence
> > * Database independence
> >
Again, the above checkbox items are too vauge to give you a real answer.
PostgreSQL is not designed as a distributed database, but it can be a piece
of a distributed database system if your trying to put one together, but
you'd need to speak more specifically of implementation details and provide
much more context to have a meaningful conversation about it.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: