Re: WALL on controller without battery?

On Wednesday 11 July 2007 08:36, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
wrote:
> Put the WAL where the battery is.  Even if it's slower (and I don't
> know whether it will be), I assume that having the right data more
> slowly is better than maybe not having the data at all, quickly.
>

Presumably he'll have the 2-port configured for write-through operation.

I would spring for a 4-port with a BBU, though, and then put the WAL on the
drives with the OS.

--
"Bad laws are the worst sort of tyranny." -- Edmund Burke (1729-1797)