On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 11:30:19 +0530 Pavan Deolasee wrote:
Hello,
> On 7/5/07, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail@wars-nicht.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 18:04:35 -0400 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> > > Most likely it is worried about XID wraparound, and those are precisely
> > > the tables that need urgent vacuumed because they haven't been vacuumed
> > > in a long time.
> >
> > No, autovacuum is doing this with every run. Beside this, the database has
> > only some 10k changes per day. The wraparound was my first idea, but i
> > don't see a reason, why this should be happen with every autovacuum run.
> >
> Did you check freeze_max_age values in the pg_autovacuum table ? A very
> small value can trigger XID wraparound related VACUUMs in every run.
The value is '0' for all columns in all entries, except 'vacrelid' and 'enabled'.
Can a VACUUM run happen, even if enabled is set to false?
Greetings from Italy
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
(Ferenc Mantfeld)