Re: autovacuum vacuums entire database...is this right?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: autovacuum vacuums entire database...is this right?
Дата
Msg-id 20070603221734.GB3813@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: autovacuum vacuums entire database...is this right?  ("richyen3@gmail.com" <richyen3@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
richyen3@gmail.com escribió:
> It's been about a month and a half, and I'm getting this VACUUM
> again.  This time, I'm wondering if there's any way to tell if
> autovacuum is doing a database-wide vacuum for the sake of xid
> wraparound or for some other reason.  Is there some sort of entry that
> gets put into the log, and if so, what log level would it be at?

No, I don't think we had yet set more extensive logging in autovacuum.

> If this doesn't get logged, could I make this a feature request?

Not really, because starting from 8.2 autovacuum no longer does that.
There is no longer a need for database-wide vacuums.  So if you're
having problems because of that, your best bet is to upgrade.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: multimaster
Следующее
От: PFC
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NULLS and User Input WAS Re: multimaster