Re: Performance issues of one vs. two split tables.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bill Moseley
Тема Re: Performance issues of one vs. two split tables.
Дата
Msg-id 20070515052254.GA24323@hank.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Performance issues of one vs. two split tables.  ("Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Performance issues of one vs. two split tables.  ("Dawid Kuroczko" <qnex42@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 06:33:26AM +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> Well, views are not going to help with memory consumption here.
> It is the table contents that gets cached in buffer cache, not the
> views contents.  So if you have a view which returns only one
> column from 15-column table, you will be caching that 15-column
> data nonetheless.  View, as the name states, is converted into
> a select on a real table.

Are you saying that in Postgresql:

    select first_name, last_name from user_table;

uses the same memory as this?

    select first_name, last_name,
    passowrd, email,
    [10 other columns]
    from user_table;



--
Bill Moseley
moseley@hank.org


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Dawid Kuroczko"
Дата:
Сообщение: Performance issues of one vs. two split tables.
Следующее
От: "Dawid Kuroczko"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance issues of one vs. two split tables.