Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?
Дата
Msg-id 20070424134515.GE15856@svr2.hagander.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:18:54AM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 April 2007 01:32, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > > That would be just because you don't know the numbering scheme.  8.2 to
> > > > 8.3 is considered "major" in these parts.  See
> > > > http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
> > >
> > > Is that official policy? I don't see any mention of it in the docs.
> >
> > Are you somehow suggesting that our website isn't official? Where did you
> > get that idea?
> >
>
> Website information can often be of a transient nature, with no history of
> changes or even the existence of information. Documentation is a little more
> permanent, and at least offers a record of agreement at a specific point in
> time.

Well, there is cvs history. But I see your point. Doesn't make it any less
official, though, just transient.

//Magnus


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gregory Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TODO idea - implicit constraints across child tables with a common column as primary key (but obviously not a shared index)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3244: problem with PREPARE