Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?
Дата
Msg-id 20070424053243.A34AADCC876@svr2.hagander.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Wild idea: 9.0?  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > That would be just because you don't know the numbering scheme.  8.2 to
> > 8.3 is considered "major" in these parts.  See
> > http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
>
> Is that official policy? I don't see any mention of it in the docs.

Are you somehow suggesting that our website isn't official? Where did you get that idea?

As for inclusion in the docs I beleive we're still waiting for your patch...

/Magnus


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TODO idea - implicit constraints across child tables with a common column as primary key (but obviously not a shared index)
Следующее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RETURN QUERY in PL/PgSQL?