Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200704181049.06775.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum vs statement_timeout
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 21:25, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think that is too strong an assumption, which is why I'm planning to
> back-patch the change to reset statement_timeout to 0 on autovacuum till
> 8.0, as discussed. I think I should also backpatch the change to set
> zero_damaged_pages as well (which is not on 8.0 AFAIR).
<blinks> Um, can I get a pointer to that thread? I can't imagine why we
would actually want to automatically destroy our data without oversight from
a DBA... I must be reading that wrong.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: