От: Alvaro Herrera
Тема: Re: Parallel Vacuum
Дата: ,
Msg-id: 20070322135205.GD4102@alvh.no-ip.org
(см: обсуждение, исходный текст)
Ответ на: Parallel Vacuum  (Dimitri)
Ответы: Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Dimitri)
Список: pgsql-performance

Скрыть дерево обсуждения

Parallel Vacuum  (Dimitri, )
 Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Alvaro Herrera, )
  Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Dimitri, )
   Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Alvaro Herrera, )
    Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Dimitri, )
     Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Alvaro Herrera, )
     Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Michael Stone, )
      Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Dimitri, )
       Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Michael Stone, )
        Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Dimitri, )
         Re: Parallel Vacuum  (Michael Stone, )

Dimitri escribió:
> Folks,
>
> is there any constrains/problems/etc. to run several vacuum processes in
> parallel while each one is 'vaccuming' one different table?

No, no problem.  Keep in mind that if one of them takes a very long
time, the others will not be able to remove dead tuples that were
killed while the long vacuum was running -- unless you are in 8.2.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


В списке pgsql-performance по дате сообщения:

От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance of count(*)
От: Tino Wildenhain
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance of count(*)