Re: Synchronized Scan update
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Synchronized Scan update |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200703021549.54084.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Synchronized Scan update (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Synchronized Scan update
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff, > Right now they are just constants defined in a header, but a GUC might > make sense. I'd like to know which version is more acceptable when I > submit my final patch. As much as I hate the thought of more GUCs, until we have a solid performance profile for synch scan we probably need them. You should include the option to turn synch_scan off, such as by setting synch_scan_threshold to -1. Oh, and remember that these now need to be able to take K/MB/GB. These options should probably go in postgresql.conf under QUERY TUNING, with their own sub-head. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: