Re: can someone explain confusing array indexing nomenclature

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Achilleas Mantzios
Тема Re: can someone explain confusing array indexing nomenclature
Дата
Msg-id 200702151224.12455.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на can someone explain confusing array indexing nomenclature  (chrisj <chrisj.wood@sympatico.ca>)
Ответы Re: can someone explain confusing array indexing nomenclature  (chrisj <chrisj.wood@sympatico.ca>)
Список pgsql-sql
Στις Τετάρτη 14 Φεβρουάριος 2007 21:31, ο/η chrisj έγραψε:
> given the following table:
>
> protocal2=> select * from sal_emp ;
>  name  |      pay_by_quarter       |                 schedule
> -------+---------------------------+---------------------------------------
>---- Bill  | {10000,10000,10000,10000} |
> {{meeting,lunch},{training,presentation}}
>  Carol | {20000,25000,25000,25000} |
> {{breakfast,consulting},{meeting,lunch}}
> (2 rows)
>
> why do the following two queries yield different results??
>
> protocal2=> SELECT schedule[1][2] FROM sal_emp WHERE name = 'Bill';
>  schedule
> ----------
>  lunch
> (1 row)
>
> protocal2=> SELECT schedule[1:1][2] FROM sal_emp WHERE name = 'Bill';
>      schedule
> -------------------
>  {{meeting,lunch}}
> (1 row)

The [n:m] notation denotes a slice of the array (not element).
So schedule[1][2] is the Array element on 2nd col of 1st row,
while schedule[1:1][2] could mean
the second row of the subarray schedule[1:1][1:2].
So these two are foundamentally different things.
In my 7.4 even if you gave
SELECT schedule[1:1][888] FROM sal_emp WHERE name = 'Bill';
you would still get  {{meeting,lunch}} as a result.
(Right or wrong is another story).
Anyway the first time you query for a "text",
the second time you query for a "text[]", so you should expect
different results.
--
Achilleas Mantzios


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: problem with join
Следующее
От: "Walter Cruz"
Дата:
Сообщение: "for SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions must appear in select list" - is that the standart or a limitation of postgresql?