Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
| От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20070211105955.GA2703@svana.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:20:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I do > agree with adding a test when you think it is likely to be able to catch > a whole class of errors, or even a specific error if it seems especially > likely to recur, but right now I'm not seeing how we do that here. Well, currently the regression tests only make a handful of functional indexes, and never insert any data into any of them. So arguably there's a benefit to just adding a handful of inserts and updates somewhere to test these. That a whole area of code not currently tested. In my memory I remember a site that displayed the code coverage of the regression tests, but I can't find it now. Does anybody know? Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: