Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto

On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:16:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> > On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> ... massive expansion of the tests doesn't seem justified
> 
> > What about the idea that's been floated in the past about a -- 
> > extensive mode for regression testing that would (generally) only be  
> > used by the build farm. That would mean others wouldn't have to  
> > suffer through extremely long make check's.
> 
> > Or is there another reason not to expand the tests?
> 
> I'm not concerned so much about the runtime as the development and
> maintenance effort...

I can see development... but are there enough changes where the
maintenance would be an issue?
-- 
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)