Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200701281836310000@07120568 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> ------- Original Message ------- > From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> > To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Sent: 28/01/07, 17:39:00 > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches > > Dave Page wrote: > > Also, three just seems like a sensible number to maintain. I kinda > > like Magnus' idea to put older releases into a sort of 'retired' mode > > though, and build only the binaries for PostgreSQL itself. > > But would that give people who have previously used the full installer > an upgrade path (that doesn't break everything around it)? Yes - they'd just unpack the archive over their install directory. Might screw up the permissions though, and wouldn't includethe docs :-( We'd certainly need to try it out thoroughly first... /D
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: