Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
| От | Jim C. Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ideas for auto-processing patches |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20070111004428.GA12217@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ideas for auto-processing patches (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Re: ideas for auto-processing patches |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:04:41AM +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > >Wouldn't there be some value to knowing whether the patch failed > >due to > >bitrot vs it just didn't work on some platforms out of the gate? > > I'm having a hard time figuring out what that value would be. How > would that knowledge affect what's needed to fix the patch? I was thinking that knowing it did work at one time would be useful, but maybe that's not the case... -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: