Re: ideas for auto-processing patches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim C. Nasby
Тема Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Дата
Msg-id 20070111004428.GA12217@nasby.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ideas for auto-processing patches  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
Ответы Re: ideas for auto-processing patches  (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>)
Re: ideas for auto-processing patches  (Richard Troy <rtroy@ScienceTools.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:04:41AM +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> >Wouldn't there be some value to knowing whether the patch failed  
> >due to
> >bitrot vs it just didn't work on some platforms out of the gate?
> 
> I'm having a hard time figuring out what that value would be. How  
> would that knowledge affect what's needed to fix the patch?

I was thinking that knowing it did work at one time would be useful, but
maybe that's not the case...
-- 
Jim Nasby                                            jim@nasby.net
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Glaesemann
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Added the word TODO in comments