Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
Hi Markus,
> what are the assumptions PostgreSQL normally does about atomic
> operations? I see sig_atomic_t is used in signal handlers. Additionally,
> there is a match for a cmpxchg instruction in some solaris ports code,
> but that's about what I found in the source.
>
> Am I safe assuming that pointer assignments are atomic (on all platforms
> PostgreSQL compiles on, that is)? (This is a 'practical advice' from the
> GNU Libc Manual) How about other integers smaller or equal in size to
> sizeof(sig_atomic_t)?
>
> I'm asking to make sure I rely on the same guarantees in my code.
Currently we rely on TransactionId being atomic; see
GetNewTransactionId. It's defined as uint32 somewhere, so I guess you
could rely on that.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support