Re: pg_ctl options

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: pg_ctl options
Дата
Msg-id 200701070114.l071EUX21320@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_ctl options  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: pg_ctl options  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > pg_config would need short ones.
> >
> > Seems we should have some,
> 
> But why?  What is the use case?  It's not like pg_config is a frequently 
> typed command.

I thought consistency.  Why do any of the commands have long and short
options?


--  Bruce Momjian   bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Dan Langille"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PGCon 2007 Program Committee
Следующее
От: elein
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question