Simon Riggs wrote:
> As discussed on -hackers, its possible to avoid writing any WAL at all
> for COPY in these circumstances:
>
Cool.
> The enclosed patch implements this, as discussed. There is no user
> interface to enable/disable, just as with CTAS and CREATE INDEX; no
> docs, just code comments.
>
IMHO, this deserves an GUC parameter (use_wal_in_copy?). Because a lot
of people use COPY because it's faster than INSERT but expects that it
will be in WAL. The default would be use_wal_in_copy = true.
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/