Re: -f
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: -f |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200701060855190000@2879532645 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | -f (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: -f
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> ------- Original Message ------- > From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> > Sent: 1/5/07, 10:52:37 PM > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] -f <output file> option for pg_dumpall > > I think this will be an exercise in time-wasting, and very possibly > destabilize *both* tools. pg_dump has never been designed to reconnect > to a different database; for instance there isn't any code for resetting > all the internal state that it gathers. I think forking a separate > pg_dump for each database is a perfectly fine arrangement, and should be > left alone. Hmm, would you be happy with my original proposal to add an append option to pg_dump? I'd also like to allow separate dumping of roles and tablespaces, and allow a default db to be specified instead of postgres/template1. /D
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: