Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Дата
Msg-id 20061227003845.GS28727@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and  (Glen Parker <glenebob@nwlink.com>)
Ответы Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and  (Glen Parker <glenebob@nwlink.com>)
Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-patches
Glen Parker wrote:

[slightly reformatted for sanity]

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >Is this something we want in 8.3?  I am thinking visible/expired would
> >be clearer terms.
>
> I'd love to see this back patched into 8.2.1 if possible.
>
> Should I resubmit with new names?

I'm not really convinced that Bruce's proposed names seem any better to
me.  What's wrong with "dead" and "live"?

As for backpatching, you already knew the answer :-)

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Следующее
От: Glen Parker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and