Re: Load distributed checkpoint

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От ITAGAKI Takahiro
Тема Re: Load distributed checkpoint
Дата
Msg-id 20061222173105.6431.ITAGAKI.TAKAHIRO@oss.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Load distributed checkpoint  ("Takayuki Tsunakawa" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Takayuki Tsunakawa" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> (1) Default case(this is show again for comparison and reminder)
> 235  80  226  77  240
> (2) Default + WAL 1MB case
> 302  328  82  330  85
> (3) Default + wal_sync_method=open_sync case
> 162  67  176  67  164
> (4) (2)+(3) case
> 322  350  85  321  84
> (5) (4) + /proc/sys/vm/dirty* tuning
> 308  349  84  349  84

(3) is very strange. Your machine seems to be too restricted
by WAL so that other factors cannot be measured properly.


I'll send results on my machine.

- Pentium4 3.6GHz with HT / 3GB RAM / Windows XP :-)
- shared_buffers=1GB
- wal_sync_method = open_datasync
- wal_buffers = 1MB
- checkpoint_segments = 16
- checkpoint_timeout = 5min

I repeated "pgbench -c16 -t500 -s50"
and picked up results around checkpoints.

[HEAD]
...
560.8
373.5 <- checkpoint is here
570.8
...

[with patch]
...
562.0
528.4 <- checkpoint (fsync) is here
547.0
...

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Pavel Stehule"
Дата:
Сообщение: xmlagg is not supported?
Следующее
От: "Pavel Stehule"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: configure problem --with-libxml