On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 22:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > >> I remember the president of Great Bridge
> > >> saying that the company needs the community, but not visa-vera --- if
> > >> the company dies, the community keeps going (as it did after Great
> > >> Bridge, without a hickup), but if the community dies, the company dies
> > >> too.
> >
> > > I 95% agree here. If EDB or CMD were go to down in flames, it could hurt
> > > the community quite a bit.
> >
> > Josh, I hate to burst your bubble, but Great Bridge employed a much
> > larger fraction of the hacker-community-at-the-time than either EDB or
> > CMD do today. We survived that, and if EDB or CMD or Greenplum or the
> > entire lot went down tomorrow, we'd survive that too.
>
> I never once suggested that the community would not survive. I said it
> would hurt productivity for "n" amount of time.
>
> Let's just be realistic here:
>
> In one fails swoop:
>
> Devrim, Alvaro, Darcy, Heikki, Bruce, Simon, Greg, Dave, Marc and I are
> all suddenly looking for employment...
and by Friday, all are working again, unless they want to take a few
weeks off. :)
> You don't think there would be an issue that could cause some grief to
> the community?
Not really. It might cause some personal grief to each, which might
cause some temporary loss of productivity. Then again, it might be a
stimulating shakeup, or "creative destruction," to borrow a phrase.
> Is it surmountable? Of course, that isn't the point. The point is
> that it is not painless.
Nothing is painless.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!