Re: recovery.conf parsing problems

Simon Riggs wrote:
> > It would probably be far easier for long-term maintenance if you
> > just built an independent lexer, instead of trying to make
> > guc-file.l serve multiple masters.
>
> Will do.

I'm actually not so sure that this is a good idea.  The lexical 
structure should be exactly the same, and some things like include 
files might become useful as well, so why should all this be 
replicated?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/