Re: record datatype comparisons
От
Andrew Sullivan
Тема
Re: record datatype comparisons
Дата
Msg-id
20061101210721.GI25856@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Ответ на
Re: record datatype comparisons (Volkan YAZICI)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Round Numeric Type "Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha" <ezequias.rocha@gmail.com>
Re: Round Numeric Type Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Re: Round Numeric Type "Ezequias Rodrigues da Rocha" <ezequias.rocha@gmail.com>
record datatype comparisons "George Pavlov" <gpavlov@mynewplace.com>
Re: record datatype comparisons Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Re: record datatype comparisons Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttnet.net.tr>
Re: record datatype comparisons Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Re: record datatype comparisons Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttnet.net.tr>
Re: record datatype comparisons Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Re: record datatype comparisons "George Pavlov" <gpavlov@mynewplace.com>
Re: record datatype comparisons Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: record datatype comparisons Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo@ttnet.net.tr>
Re: record datatype comparisons Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 11:00:04PM +0200, Volkan YAZICI wrote: > But there should be a way to reach the types of the attributes of the > record data type. Otherwise, how would it be possible to place it into > another tuple as an attribute. Well, surely there is, but that has to happen at assignment time, AFAICT. So you can decide what the record is on the basis of the datatype, but you can't write an equality operator, because you don't know what the general rule is going to be in advance. At least, that's as far as I'm able to understand how to do this. But I'm really past my Latin at this point, because even if I looked at the code that supports the record type, I wouldn't understand it. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness. --George Orwell
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления
От: Craig Servin
Дата: