Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
| От | Jim C. Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20061020044411.GS26892@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | adminpack and pg_catalog (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:37:34PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote: > Why does adminpack install functions into pg_catalog? This is > inconsistent with the rest of the contrib/ packages, not to mention the > definition of pg_catalog itself (which ought to hold builtin object > definitions). And as AndrewSN pointed out on IRC, it also breaks > pg_dump. When we wrote newsysviews we faced the same dilema of where to put things. We ultimately decided on a pg_ schema in the hope that no one else would use that name (we also prefaced everything in the schema with pg_, but a big reason for that was potential inclusion into core). -- Jim Nasby jim@nasby.net EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: