Re: Sane error messages for SSL retry cases

On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:18:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> at the error string is of course not localization-proof, so we'd have to
> break down that errcode into some more-specific categories.  Which is
> probably not a bad idea anyway, but it would mean that the nicer
> behavior would only happen when talking to an 8.2 or later server.
> 
> Thoughts?  Is this something to tackle during beta, or must we put it
> off till 8.3?

It sounds to me like a very nice idea that has to wait for the next
cycle.  Just getting agreement on the categories will take time and
cycles, no?

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
When my information changes, I alter my conclusions.  What do you do sir?    --attr. John Maynard Keynes