Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On the other hand, I don't understand why DocBook would be Latin-1
> only. What would be the point of that limitation?  Some googling
> seems to reveal that people indeed uses other charsets, UTF-8 in
> particular (but also Big5, Latin-2, etc), so apparently this isn't
> set in stone.  (I admit that they mainly talk about XML Docbook
> though).

DocBook SGML is Latin 1; DocBook XML, like all XML, is UCS-4.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/