Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Martijn van Oosterhout
Тема Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because
Дата
Msg-id 20060923121906.GB24323@svana.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:54:47AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > Well you could always use te HTML4 ı which most tools should
> > understand. At least browsers have good support for this kind of
> > entity.
>
> Please review the recent thread on pgsql-docs before reiterating all the
> suggestions.

Oh sorry, it wasn't clear from the commit entry. It's not that DocBook
doesn't support the character or that it can't be represented. It's
just not supported in the document encoding we're using.

Sorry for the noise.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i as plain i, because
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i