Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alan Hodgson
Тема Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)
Дата
Msg-id 200609181401.03679@hal.medialogik.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)  ("Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Monday 18 September 2006 13:56, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
wrote:
> just another fyi, if you have a really big database, you can forget
> about doing pg_dump for backups (unless you really don't care about
> being x day or days behind)...you simply have to due some type of
> replication/failover strategy.  i would start with pitr.

And, of course, the biggest problem of all; upgrades.

--
Eat right. Exercise regularly. Die anyway.


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Merlin Moncure"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as expected)
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuums on large busy databases