Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> My memory says this was eventually removed, even though it was committed
> >> for a time. Am I wrong?
> >> - Make EXPLAIN sampling smarter, to avoid excessive sampling delay
> >> (Martijn van Oosterhout)
>
> > I see a reversion for EXPLAIN ANALYZE only:
>
> > date: 2006/06/09 19:30:56; author: tgl; state: Exp; lines: +27 -172
> > Revert sampling patch for EXPLAIN ANALYZE; it turns out to be too
> > unreliable because node timing is much less predictable than the patch
> > expects. I kept the API change for InstrStopNode, however.
>
> > so the item is probably still OK.
>
> No, Simon is right, that entry should be removed --- there's nothing
> interesting left of the patch :-(
I see. Removed.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +