Re: log_duration is redundant, no?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Дата
Msg-id 200609071514.04595.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: log_duration is redundant, no?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> I don't find this very persuasive --- it sounds awfully messy, and in
> fact isn't that exactly the old behavior we got rid of because no one
> could understand it?

Well, we want analogous functionality.   We could stand to have it 
named/organized differently.   But maybe we should hold those chages for 
8.3, so that they can be tested properly?

I am finding that the log format prior to Bruce's change, which we were 
using for TPCE, makes it very hard to do log digest analysis if you use 
SPs or prepared queries at all.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Следующее
От: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ECPG/OpenBSD buildfarm failures, take I