On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:06:02AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net> writes:
> > There's a lot of duplicate code in ecpg.
>
> No kidding :-(. The parser is bad enough but the datatype library is
> an order of magnitude worse. I don't have a great solution at hand
> though. The backend utils/adt/ code gets to rely on the backend's
Neither have I.
> error handling and memory management protocols, which I surely do
> not propose to remove, but how could we keep common sources when
> ecpglib has to work in a far less friendly environment?
We could modify the backend code to use pgtypeslib, but that would cost
at least a little bit of performance I would guess.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!