Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors)
| От | Robert Treat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200608222315.59454.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES]
Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) Re: pgsql-patches reply-to (was Re: [PATCHES] selecting large result sets in psql using cursors) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 17 August 2006 11:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Yeah, that experiment hasn't seemed to work all that well for me
> > either. Do you have another idea to try, or do you just want to
> > revert to the old way?
>
> Since almost the first day I hacked on PostgreSQL I have been filtering
> both lists into the same folder, so they pretty much appear to be one
> and the same to me anyway.
I'm curious, do you combine any other lists like that? I've played around
with that idea (for example, I used to combine webmaster emails, pgsql-www,
and -slaves emails but the slaves traffic was too high so I had to split it
back out). As someone subscribed to a good dozen pg lists, I've always been
quite amazed how much email some of the folks here manage to process... I
suppose I could just chalk it up to a pine vs. gui thing, but I suspect there
are some other tricks people have to make emails more manageable (anyone
combine all pg mail to one folder?)
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: